Has anybody else noticed the interesting use of language by the media lately regarding the gun registry debate?
One of my personal favourites that is being bandied about these days is “sniper rifle.” The media and the Gun Control Lobby are telling us that there will be sniper rifles everywhere when the registry is destroyed. Too bad there’s no such thing.
A sniper is a person, not a type of firearm. Simply put, any rifle that a sniper chooses to use, may be called a sniper rifle. Whether that rifle is a gopher gun or a military rifle, if the person using it is an expert marksman (sniper) then it could be called a sniper rifle. Similarly, many rifles are designed to shoot over 1km effective range. That does not mean that they are by their nature a sniper rifle. It is the skill of the shooter that determines whether it is one or not.
The other term that’s a media favourite is “assault rifle.” Here’s a nice example for you. The M16 is a military rifle. The C8 is a variant of the M16 used by Canadian police forces. The AR-15 is a civilian variant that is hugely popular among sport shooters. The M16 and C8 are full-automatic – this means the gun will continue to fire as long as the trigger is depressed (commonly known as a “machine gun”). The AR-15 is semi-automatic – this means the gun will fire only one bullet when the trigger is depressed. Apart from this difference, they are all virtually identical. They all have a very similar muzzle velocity and effective range and all fire the same round.
What’s my point, you ask? My point is this. Whenever the media writes about the C8 rifle, they will correctly refer to it as a carbine. However, when those same media outlets write about the civilian AR-15, they will refer to it as an “assault rifle.” If anything it’s an anti-assault rifle, but I digress.
You will also see the gun used in the Ecole Polytechnique massacre, the Ruger Mini 14, being referred to as an assault rifle. It is, in reality, nothing more than a gopher gun. Why? Quite simply, the term “assault rifle” sounds scary to the uninformed public. They want to create an image of crazed gun nuts running around our city streets with machine guns.
As I have illustrated many times before on this blog, the Gun Control Lobby knows they have no facts to support their cause, so they hope to sway people with emotion instead. It would be nice if the media would remember that they are supposed to be objectively reporting the news, not helping lobby groups to create it.